<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A burst of commits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cubussapiens.hu/2009/08/a-burst-of-commits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cubussapiens.hu/2009/08/a-burst-of-commits/</link>
	<description>A Cubus Sapiens oldal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:46:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balage.g</title>
		<link>http://cubussapiens.hu/2009/08/a-burst-of-commits/comment-page-1/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Balage.g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cubussapiens.hu/?p=20#comment-538</guid>
		<description>I think there is no need to release this version yet (I&#039;ve started working on cooperability with variables view though), so we can wait for some new features before that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is no need to release this version yet (I&#8217;ve started working on cooperability with variables view though), so we can wait for some new features before that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stampie</title>
		<link>http://cubussapiens.hu/2009/08/a-burst-of-commits/comment-page-1/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>Stampie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cubussapiens.hu/?p=20#comment-537</guid>
		<description>Well, if we could use this rewrite as a basis for some simple new features, it could go well. There are some ideas in the tracker.

On the other hand, do we need to release this version now? If not, then maybe some bigger features could be implemented.

To use version 0.6.2 for this rewrite: I don&#039;t suggest. It looks quite big and too central for the project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if we could use this rewrite as a basis for some simple new features, it could go well. There are some ideas in the tracker.</p>
<p>On the other hand, do we need to release this version now? If not, then maybe some bigger features could be implemented.</p>
<p>To use version 0.6.2 for this rewrite: I don&#8217;t suggest. It looks quite big and too central for the project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

